Under the Magnifying Glass
  Observation of Trifles
  By Steven H. Fyffe
  sfyffe@maccompanion.com
  “Look
    Papa!” Jared exclaimed, pointing to the ground. My grandson interrupted our
    trek to the ice cream store, stooping down to inspect bicycle tracks made in
    the dirt. He then wrote notes in his imaginary journal. 
   
  Sherlock
    Holmes scrutinizes the grass along a path, in A Study of Scarlet, when a sudden expression of
    satisfaction crosses his lips, having determined which scoundrel had done the
    dirty deed. 
   
  A
    Biblical Greek student slowly parsed each syllable of the text I assigned him
    to read aloud in class. Then, his face brightened in recognition. He rather
    sheepishly read without hesitation John 3:16 from the Greek Bible. 
   
  What
    do Jared, Sherlock, and this student have in common? They all experienced the
    joy of discovery through inductive analysis.
    
  “You
    know my method. It is founded upon the observation of trifles” … “It is, of
    course, a trifle, but there is nothing so important as trifles” so spoke
    Sherlock Holmes.
    Holmes's creator, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
    was a physician and he based the Holmes character on his medical school
    professor Joseph Bell, who emphasized the importance of
    close observation of details in making a medical diagnosis. Bell was one of the
    first to apply scientific observation to forensic investigations, just as
    Doyle’s character often lectured Watson to practice in their many adventures.
   
  In my experience,
    teaching Biblical Greek and nurturing our girls in home school, inductive
    learning    is the fastest and surest method for retaining knowledge. The Georgia
    Department of Education    gives a very clear description of inductive learning. To paraphrase, inductive
    learning is built on the process of inductive thinking and helps students
    connect what they discover with their prior knowledge. By carefully examining
    seemingly unrelated details, “trifles” as Holmes called them, students learn to
    classify these pieces of the puzzle into groups with common characteristics,
    learn to apply what they have learned to any project they tackle, and motivates
    them with the desire to learn more. 
   
  Let me share
    another example. Jared started in kindergarten last week with all the traumatic
    emotions that entails. But in spite of that, he was guided into a discovery of
    the letters i and s and how they magically form the word is. The teacher did not
    define the rules of grammar or explain the difference between a verb and a noun
    … deductive lecturing will come later. Although there were tears from the
    academic torture, Jared truly enjoyed his “guided discovery”  of the letters i and s, telling his mom “I want to see how many is’s I can write.”  
   
  Building upon
    his audiolingualismexperience, i.e. mimicking what he heard from parents and
      others, with his new found discovery of the letter i, he formed the words it and in. He picked up on this, all on his own, while his
        mom was reading to him. WOW! In less than two weeks he can write a sentence
        fragment, “It is in”. 
   
  All on his own, Jared fit the puzzle pieces of language
    together. He will retain this knowledge much longer than if he had sat through
    a lecture … in one ear and out the other. By sharing what he has learned, Jared
    will seal that knowledge into his memory … he taught grandma and grandpa to
    spell is and later
      proudly told his mom he taught us how to spell it. 
   
  Those who love
    puzzles examine each piece, groups together those with common characteristics,
    and, for those with a keen eye for observation, the pieces of a puzzle fall
    into place to form a beautiful picture.
   
  Likewise,
    detectives like Sherlock Holmes and Adrian Monk develop an eagle’s eye for what
    may seem to be the most obsure trifle. “Elementary, my dear Watson.”
   
  Now, you may be like Dr. Watson in A Study of Scarlet and are thinking “What ineffable
    twaddle.” Well, I have given you the first clue. Perhaps, you have formulated
    your first conjecture as to why I gave my column the title, “Under the
    Magnifying Glass.” Perhaps, you found the first piece to the puzzle in understanding
    the purpose for the beautiful graphic my daughter, Amy, designed for us. 
   
  However, you probably are still scratching your head as to
    why I am penning an article about inductive analysis in macCompanion? Well, the
    mystery will become clearer in the months to come, but let me say that we are
    embarking on a great adventure, a safari if you will. 
   
  To give a taste of our
    future escapades, here is your first “guided discovery” assignment: Open a Quick Time movie. Resize the window, by clicking and
    holding the lower right corner. Do you notice any limitations? Now, hold the
    Shift key down, while doing the same thing. What did you discover? Wasn’t that
    fun? You discovered, with a little guidance, this hidden gem. Now, share your
    discovery with someone else. Don’t just tell them (deductive lecture), but lead
    them to a “guided discovery” of this fun feature of Quick Time.
    
  
 
   
  Please come back next month and visit “Under the Magnifying
    Glass”, where I hope to be your companion in another adventure. As we get to
    know one another, we will be steering each other toward a “guided discovery”
    of the Macintosh and all those other creative tools and toys we enjoy so much.
    I want to invite you to come back and sit a spell. Experience the same kind of excitement discovering the Macintosh, as
      Jared and his Papa have when they discover bicycle tracks in the dirt and letters of the alphabet.