Dan's Scans
Sometimes, It's hard to be objective!
by Dan Robinson
It seems I waffle between
Old-Fartism and Thechie. I gleefully embrace the latest and greatest Macinstuff
while steadfastly yearning for the Good Old Days when products offered for sale
worked as advertised.
I enjoy getting new products
and writing reviews. But sometimes it's just plain frustrating.
A good ferinstance is two items
I recently received for review. Both were cutting edge . . . but not TOO
cutting edge. And neither of which worked. Both products were name brands, too.
The one that didn't work at all was a big
name brand. (I'm not naming names here, but if you really want to know, send me
an email.)
So here I am with item #1. I go
to a client's office and explain that I'm going to use a new product and it'll
make things ever so much easier and quicker. Twenty minutes later, it's hung.
Try again. Same result. Not
only that, there is no evidence that anything at all happened in the preceding
third of an hour.
I've now wasted 40 minutes I
can't charge the client for, and I've lost some credibility. I revert to the
old fashioned way. Tried and true. I do it by hand. Taking over an hour.
This is the fourth item I've
received from this company that either didn't work, worked poorly, or was so
mundane that it wasn't worth a review.
Do you remember the good old
days? When things hit the shelves in working order? It's like these people
consider me their own private test bench.
This time I didn't even call
the company's help desk. It went in the trash. They had their chance. No
review, either. Should I have written a five-word review? "This. Product.
Did. Not. Work."
Item #2 was a combination of
hardware and software, too. I really need this product and I was really rooting
for it to get a fine review. In October, I installed it on my MacPro and SPLAT!
Unusable. Seventy percent of
the features flat didn't work. What did work, though, was beautiful. November,
they published an update. Same splat.
Hello help desk! Since then,
I've been in touch with their help desk, their PR person, the help desk's boss,
and even the author of the freaking app! I've installed it on my MacBook Pro
and it works great! But I don't NEED it on my laptop!
So what am I going to do? Write
a lousy review based on the app's uselessness? Write a good review based on my
laptop? Write a mixed review based on all the personal attention I've received
from the company's tech support?
Typically, a review works like
this:
A new item is announced by the
company, and they send out notices (In this case to Robert Pritchett, macCompanion's publisher.)
If a reviewer expresses an
interest in the item, the manufacturer sends them a boxed retail version . . .
the same as you'd buy in the store. If it's just software, it's typically
downloaded.
Then the reviewer spends some
time with the product in a real-world test. I have a backpack, several laptop
cases and a TON of iPhone stuff that I would never ever use. And boxes and
boxes of applications. To give these products a fair shake, we spend quite a
few hours with them.
To write a review takes several
hours more. Sometimes I take pictures and screenshots to add to the
manufacturer's promo graphics.
Last month I reviewed a laptop
case with a plastic window that speeds your way through the inspection line at
airports. I carried it around for a couple of days, wrote a positive review,
and went back to my old laptop case which fits my style better, since I rarely
fly.
I maybe spent four hours on the
entire review process. If I were to charge a client for those four hours, be
very sure the bill would have been at least eight times the retail price of the
case.
Now, several manufacturers and
publishers automatically send me items for review.
So sometimes it's a pain.
Sometimes I get something I can actually use. But when I get something that
simply doesn't work, I get upset.
I miss the good old days.
Editor's Note: Really, if you want to know what items are DOA
(Dead On Arrival) or Just. Don't. Work.ï contact Dan at drobinson@maccompanion.com
Just remember, when they don't
work, we don't give them press.