JonHoyle.com Mirror of MacCompanion
http://www.maccompanion.com/macc/archives/September2008/Greenware/MythoftheOilCrisis.htm

macCompanion MyAppleSpace Forum Archives Products Services About Us FAQs

Resources

                                           

Consultants

Developers

Devotees

Downloads

"Foreign" Macs

Forums

Hearsay

Link Lists

Mac 3D

Macazines

Mac Jobs

MUG Shots

News

Radio

Reviews

Think Different

Training

 

The Myth of the Oil Crisis

Reviewed by Robert Pritchett

Author: Robin M. Mills

http://www.oilcrisismyth.com

Greenwood Publishing

http://www.praeger.com/catalog/B36498.aspx

Released: August 30, 2008

Pages: 336

$25 USD, GBP £14

ISBN-13: 978-0-313-36498-3

Strengths: Real facts can't be disputed.

Weaknesses: Robin Mills still doesn’t believe in Abiotic Oil, but does fully accept anthropomorphic climate change (Global Warming™).

Other Reviews: http://www.oilcrisismyth.com/index_files/Page709.htm

Introduction

"It seems self-evident to many that oil resources are on the verge of running out, that we are approaching ‘peak oil’, after which oil production will inevitably decline. ‘End of oil’ books, articles, blogs and TV shows proliferate. A complex of myths about oil has grown up that hamper us from making rational decisions about energy.

‘The Myth of the Oil Crisis’ establishes that, contrary to ‘peak oil’ arguments:

  • Models used to predict ‘peak oil’ production are flawed, unscientific and have repeatedly failed in the past
  • Global oil  reserves are, overall, not heavily over-stated
  • There is large remaining exploration potential around the world, in OPEC countries, new frontiers and even mature non-OPEC nations
  • Resources of unconventional oil—heavy oil, oil sands, gas– and coal-derived liquids, biofuels and others—are enormous, much larger than the conventional oil endowment
  • Unconventional oil can be produced fast enough to replace a decline in conventional oil
  • Geopolitical issues and terrorism are not an insuperable threat to world oil supplies
  • If necessary, oil consumption can be reduced dramatically even while living standards continue to improve
  • New technologies and sensible policies can radically reduce the environmental impact of hydrocarbons and tackle climate change

With oil well over $100 a barrel, drivers wince whenever they pull into the gas station and businesses watch their bottom lines shrink. "Watch out," say doomsayers, "it will only get worse as oil dries up." It's a plausible argument, especially considering the rate at which countries like China and India are now sucking up oil. Even more troubling, the world's largest oil fields sit in geopolitical hotspots like Iran and Iraq. Some believe their nations need to secure remaining supplies using military force, while others consider dwindling supplies a blessing that will help solve the problem of global warming. But wait--is it really the "end of oil"? Absolutely not, says geologist, economist, and industry-insider Robin Mills.

 

According to Mills, many ideas about petroleum depletion and its consequences are not just grossly overstated but plain wrong. Calmly and persuasively, he argues:

The supply of oil and gas is much larger than imagined by the pessimists.

Seeking political, military, or commercial control of oil supplies is unnecessary, self-defeating, and exorbitantly expensive.

 

Oil is merely one convenient source of energy.

 

Opportunities exist to decrease the global consumption of oil radically while maintaining a healthy economy.

 

The environmental impact of fossil fuels is the most serious problem the world faces today. But a portfolio of solutions can solve it.

 

There is no other book by an industry insider that effectively counters the "peak oil" theory by showing where and how oil will be found in the future. There also is no other book by an insider that lays out an environmentally and geopolitically responsible path for the petroleum industry and its customers. The Myth of the Oil Crisis, written in a lively style but with scientific rigor, is thus a uniquely useful resource for business leaders, policymakers, petroleum industry professionals, environmentalists, and anyone else who consumes oil. Best of all, it offers an abundance of one commodity now in short supply: hope for the future."

 

What I Learned

This book gives much-needed insight into what is and what is not instead of relying on works of fiction or political maneuvering to come to valid conclusions.

 

And it jives with the page I put up on PESWiki regarding North American Oil Fields –

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:North_American_Oil_Fields

Robin also as an "insider", defends turf by attempting to negate petroleum as a renewable resource and still promulgates it as a shrinking resource  - just not fully exploited.  Perhaps my article on the topic of Abiotic Oil would be enlightening?

http://www.maccompanion.com/macc/archives/April2008/Greenware/Fossil.htm

Besides that little aside, this book is full of excellent meat for the oil debate table. I love the segregation and categorization of  the "Five Schools of Thought"; Economists, Geologists, Mercantilists, Militarists, and Neo-Luddites and their definitions.

 

I appreciated very much the Abbreviations page that I referred to time and again for such Oilogopoly terms, such as boe (barrels of oil equivalent), EUR (Estimated Ultimate Recovery) and YtF (Yet to Find).

 

The various Figures and Table were well-placed and easy to read. The Notes, Bibliography and Index made this book a scholarly effort. In other words the printers did an excellent job editing and compiling this yet-to-become Classic.

My take-away is that just because we haven't drilled for petroleum in various places on earth doesn't mean it isn't there and the "shortage" in just about all instances is due to war and civil unrest and not due to depletion. Oh  that and the other war known as "Geopolitics" that keep us from exploiting resources, such as Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska spoke of prior to her nomination for the Vice Presidency of the US.

 

Conclusions

It has been videoed, debated and now in style it is in print regarding what is real and what is not about petroleum under the earth.

 

Just ignore the various "Climate Change" comments and move on. They don't really belong in the book, especially since it attempts successfully to dispel the Peak Oil™ Myth - http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Peak_Oil, but it is time to bury the Global Warming™ Myth - http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Global_Warming

 as well and stop promulgating it. But perhaps that will be forthcoming in another book.